Radio
ad writing is a form of creative communication. Your goal is to communicate
with your target listener in a way that is meaningful and memorable to them.
The
rules of “formal writing” may have served you well in your post secondary
education BUT radio advertising is all about writing informal and genuine
conversations with real people.
So
today I present my Top 3 list of “formal writing” rules you should toss to
make your ad copy more engaging:
Tossable Rule #1: Use a
sophisticated vocabulary with terms that are accepted in the topic’s field.
I’ve
been married for over 11 years and I’ve seen a lot of romantic comedies. You
know how to spot the bad guy that the girl will not end up with?
Chris Sarandon as Prince Humperdink in “The Princess Bride”
Look
for the guy with the sophisticated vocabulary…because society has decided that
this means he is a smarmy elitist and will ultimately put himself before
others. An ad that gives off this impression and talks down to it’s target won’t
be very convincing.
Instead, try writing in the
language of your target consumer.
If
you find it difficult to lock in the lingo of your target because you’re a 20
something male and you’re trying to write to 50 something females, then go to a
website that is written for your target and emulate the style. A brief look at
betterafter50.com tells me that 50 something females struggle to prepare their
adult children for independent life, enjoy the music of Prince, and find Donald
Trump’s hair amusing. Feel free to borrow certain phrases, terms and insights.
Just make sure you have a 50 something female proof your copy to make sure you
haven’t used something out of context.
Use
“terms that are acceptable in the topic’s field” if you are addressing people
within that field. For example, if you’re trying to convince dentists to join
an association of regional dentists, then feel free to talk about the benefits
of correcting malocclusion while the mandible is still malleable.
Don’t
use them if you are addressing people outside the topic’s field because it will
confuse and alienate them. For example, if you are trying to convince
homeowners to get a new roof, then using roofing terms like “end laps” and “selvage”
will make people fear dealing with your roofing client.
Tossable
Rule #2: Avoid a “first person” perspective. The
formal writer is disconnected from the topic and does not use the first person
point of view (I or we) or second person (you).
My intro to the power of “First Person” was Wolfenstein 3D
You’re writing on behalf of your client’s business and trying to build a
bond between them and the listener. Why would you avoid writing from the
perspective that is the most personal? During my career, I’ve worked with
announcers that didn’t want to say “we” because they were not paid representatives
of the client’s business. I respect this perspective and only use these
announcers on ads where first person isn’t required. At the same time, I
actively search out voices that are willing to voice in the first person
because it’s more genuine and more likely to connect with people.
Explore more about the difference between first and third person at: http://www.skillsyouneed.com/write/formal-or-informal.html#ixzz47bc6G1Oi
Explore more about the difference between first and third person at: http://www.skillsyouneed.com/write/formal-or-informal.html#ixzz47bc6G1Oi
Tossable Rule #3: Always
use Proper Grammar
Igor and the Grammar Slammer in “The Hilarious House of Frightenstein”
Proper
grammar is of the utmost importance…if you are writing for academics and robots
but 99 percent of the time…you’ll be writing for regular people. You’re more
likely to reach these people if you are willing to just “shoot the shit” with
them. Here is a list of very successful ad campaigns taken from about.com that
would have been dreadful if proper grammar was observed:
GOT MILK?
Grammatically, that's not good at all. If you were to put that through the grammar filter, it would come out as something more like "Do You Have Milk?" But that's dry, and awful. Got Milk? was catchy, simple and created a craze. It helped sell a lot of milk, and was endorsed by many major celebrities.
Grammatically, that's not good at all. If you were to put that through the grammar filter, it would come out as something more like "Do You Have Milk?" But that's dry, and awful. Got Milk? was catchy, simple and created a craze. It helped sell a lot of milk, and was endorsed by many major celebrities.
Think Different - Apple
If it were 100% correct, it would be Think Differently. Again, that's not a strong piece of communication. Tonally, it has less teeth. It's stiff. Boring. Think Different was bold and brave.
If it were 100% correct, it would be Think Differently. Again, that's not a strong piece of communication. Tonally, it has less teeth. It's stiff. Boring. Think Different was bold and brave.
Make Summer Funner - Target
A lovely little campaign from a few years ago. Grammatically speaking, it's an F. But "Make Summer More Fun" is bland. The incorrect version works.
A lovely little campaign from a few years ago. Grammatically speaking, it's an F. But "Make Summer More Fun" is bland. The incorrect version works.
The Few. The Proud. The Marines. - U.S.
Marine Corps.
Three two-word sentences back-to-back? That's not good. But it is. A good, simple sentence should have at least a subject and a predicate. However, once again the rules have been broken to create a phrase with impact.
Three two-word sentences back-to-back? That's not good. But it is. A good, simple sentence should have at least a subject and a predicate. However, once again the rules have been broken to create a phrase with impact.
If you are a badge wearing member of the grammar
police…I recommend that you explore another perspective and check out the full
article “Grammar. Don’t. Matter. – Perfect Syntax is No Substitute for Great
Communication” at http://advertising.about.com/od/copywriting/a/Grammar-Do-Not-Matter.htm
I also recommend reading “There Is No Proper English” by Oliver Kamm of
the Wall Street Journal at
Picture featured on torontorealtyblog.com
Rules
are helpful when you are trying to organize information to share with people.
I’ve used “rules of radio” a couple of times while compiling these articles.
BUT I want you to understand that for every rule I’ve learned about radio
advertising, I have witnessed the opposite approach succeed. How is this
possible? The writer knew that any rule can be and should be tossed if it
results in more meaningful and memorable communication. So learn the rules…then
learn HOW and WHEN to break them.
Ryan Ghidoni is an 18-year veteran of radio advertising and has worked with some of
the most creative sales reps, writers, producers and voice talent in the
business.
CHECK OUT “Audio Active Advertising” every week on Puget Sound Radio.
THE
ONLINE AGENCY IS OPEN: Get “Audio Active” ads for your
clients with Audio Active Advertising’s online agency. Check out over 100
Effective Ad Examples and then become the next one by ordering a Radio Single
OR a Radio Campaign. Go to audioactiveadvertising.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment