I love Bob Hoffman and I’ve quoted his blog, The Ad
Contrarian, many times to convince clients that online advertising is overrated
and that they should stick with traditional media. The radio industry has fully
embraced his ideas because he provides us with ammunition to defend against the
imminent threat of new media. BUT instead of trying to imitate Bob in this
column, I’m going to suggest something that is contrary to how the radio industry
uses the Ad Contrarian.
Let’s take a time-out
from our defensive position against new media and take a closer at what radio
can learn from their leader…Google.
First, lets look at
what makes Google unique:
Google is constantly refining its product. They don’t follow
Microsoft’s “version release” model where ideas and new features are stored up
until they have enough of them to release the next version.
Great radio requires the same approach. Don’t wait until a
format change to suddenly be better at engaging the audience. Come up with ways
to improve listener engagement everyday and implement ideas immediately. Why
would you wait?
Google’s mission is “to organize the world’s information and
to make it universally accessible and useful”. Notice there is nothing about
maximizing profit, growth and shareholder value. They don’t even mention their
advertisers. Their mission is completely focused on their user because their
number one guideline at Google is “focus on the user and all else will follow”.
The radio industry could really benefit from a singular
focus. We’re locked in a tug of war between programming goals and sales goals where
the majority of the decisions favor the needs of the station’s clients. If we
were to adapt Google’s user focused guideline we could align the staff to one
common goal of serving the listener and create the kind of station that our
advertising clients would WANT to be on.
What can we learn from
Google’s philosophy about advertising?
Google believes that advertising should be clearly identified
and not disguised as content. Do a quick google search for “plumbing” or
“chicken” and notice how the paid ads are identified as such.
Radio, for the most part, does a good job of this too BUT we
have been to known to sell unnatural product placement conversations in our
morning shows. I still laugh about how the listeners at a station I worked for
thought paid conversations for the launch of Johnsonville Sausages was a parody
bit crafted by the morning show. The listeners just couldn’t believe that
someone would actually use “Johnson” in a name for a sausage product.
Google believes that advertising
should be relevant to the user’s need and useful to the user. This is not just
something they say. They invested time to develop AdWords and AdSense. AdWords
makes it so paid search messages only appear when people are searching for
words associated with the product. AdSense matches display ads with the content
on the website that the ad appears on and the audience the site attracts.
Radio has a format system that targets specific demographics
but I don’t think we do enough to make sure that the ads match the
audience. When we ask our clients “Who
do you want to target?”, we need to clarify that they should choose from the demos
the station is strong in. We should also
provide more guidance on how to speak to our demos so that the ads are more
listener focused and relevant.
Google developed “Display Ad Builder” that not only shows
advertisers how to build an effective display ad, it makes it possible for
anyone to make one.
Radio needs to show our clients how to use radio more
effectively. Is a “Radio Ad Builder” possible? It could help clients focus on
the right info, provide them with example ad templates, and educate them on how
to take advantage of radio’s strengths. The writers could focus on refining the
ad instead of having to start from zero with every new client. The first
company to develop a “Radio Ad Builder” would have a significant edge over
their competition. Once everyone offers one, it will benefit the industry as a
whole.
Google believes that less is better than more. This goes hand
in hand with their “ads must be relevant” philosophy. When they say “less” they
mean the user is exposed to less ads AND the ads are actually relevant. The
user benefits from a more clutter free experience. The advertiser benefits
because the user is more likely to notice, understand, remember, and act on the
relevant advertisements if they are not delivered with a boat load of
irrelevant advertising.
Great radio stations need to respect a proper balance of ads
to content.
Google believes advertising should be accessible to all
businesses regardless of size. AdWords made it easy for small businesses to
access and purchase search advertising. All they need is a credit card and
their ads will appear within minutes alongside the big players in the industry.
Radio does a good job of serving businesses that are large
enough to invest $30,000 to $100,000 annually in advertising but has yet to
come up with a way to be accessible to smaller and start-up businesses. We can
sell them a small amount of ads but we know that without sustained frequency,
they are unlikely to see a return on their investment. If we were to offer a
highly reduced evening and overnight price point only to businesses under a certain
size, we could help businesses grow to become the $30,000 to $100,000 investors
we are looking for. Imagine how much they would use our services if we were the
ones who helped them get big enough to afford us.
Google’s advertising
growth plans: luckily they don’t involve radio…for now.
As television programming migrates from traditional
distribution to online, Google seeks to provide television advertising options
for clients. No doubt they’ll evolve the ad form by incorporating benefits that
only YouTube, twitter, blogger and website development can offer. They’re also
into mobile telephone advertising where the Google “relevant” approach has the
potential of considering your current location. With this info you could
receive lunch specials for a restaurant you are about to drive by at 11:30am.
Right now the Radio Industry is lucky that both Apple and
Google prefer a “monthly subscription” revenue model for their Apple Music and
Google Play music services. BUT…it is possible that these companies, that
refine and improve their product everyday, may one day offer a free version of
these services that generate revenue by playing a couple of relevant ads every
twenty minutes. After all, offering a variety of distinctive formats is a great
way to deliver a relevant message to a specific market segment. Radio fits in
well with what Google wants to provide its users and advertisers.
It’s easy to take a defensive position against new media and
make it yet another “us vs them” endeavor. If radio is going to adapt and
survive we need to take the time to analyze popular substitute forms of
advertising and learn from their success. It plays a significant role in
becoming better.
If we aren’t able to
offer better radio and be a more effective advertising platform…one day
soon…Google will.
Next week
we’ll continue to talk about “The Power of One” by focusing on the importance
of One Core Emotion. I was supposed to do that this week but the Google thing
got in my head and I had to get it out.
Ryan Ghidoni is an 18-year veteran of radio advertising and has worked with some of
the most creative sales reps, writers, producers and voice talent in the
business.
CHECK OUT “Audio Active Advertising” every week on Puget Sound Radio.
FREE OFFER: Sign up for the “Radio Ad of the Week” at audioactiveadvertising.com and
every week you’ll receive our featured ad and a brief description of what makes
it tick.
THE
ONLINE AGENCY IS OPEN: Get “Audio Active” ads for your
clients with Audio Active Advertising’s online agency. Check out over 100
Effective Ad Examples and then become the next one by ordering an Audio Active
Campaign. Go to audioactiveadvertising.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment